<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Positive News On Real Estate &#187; OC at 2005 Demand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/pr/256/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.positiveonrealestate.com</link>
	<description>Positive Real Estate News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OC at 2005 Demand</title>
		<link>http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/pr/256</link>
		<comments>http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/pr/256#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Positive Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OC Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orange county]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been getting reports all over SoCal of multiple offers. As the article points out, someone turned on the spigot. http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2009/04/20/demand-for-oc-homes-back-at-2005-levels/19395/ It would take 2.97 months for buyers to gobble up all homes for sale at the current pace vs. 3.40 months two weeks vs. 6.55 months a year ago vs. 7.75 two years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been getting reports all over SoCal of multiple offers. As the article points out, someone turned on the spigot.</p>
<p><a href="http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2009/04/20/demand-for-oc-homes-back-at-2005-levels/19395/">http://lansner.freedomblogging.com/2009/04/20/demand-for-oc-homes-back-at-2005-levels/19395/</a></p>
<ul>
<li>It would take 2.97 months for buyers to gobble up all homes for sale at the current pace vs. 3.40 months two weeks vs. 6.55 months a year ago vs. 7.75 two years ago.</li>
<li> Homes listed for under a million bucks have a market time of 2.34 months vs. 14.51 months for homes listed for more than $1 million.</li>
<li> Just 19 days worth of <a href="http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/foreclosure_listings?fdcsubmit=1&amp;st=ca&amp;cno=059">O.C. foreclosures for sale</a>!</li>
</ul>
<h3 class='related_post_title'>More related Positive News</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li><a href='http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/pr/395' title='Los Angeles Times Declares a Bottom'>Los Angeles Times Declares a Bottom</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/pr/3' title='Lasner: Demand for OC Homes at 2005 Levels'>Lasner: Demand for OC Homes at 2005 Levels</a></li>
</ul><div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=OC+at+2005+Demand+http%3A%2F%2Fpositiveonrealestate.com%2F%3Fp%3D256" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="tt twitter OC at 2005 Demand"  title="OC at 2005 Demand" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=OC+at+2005+Demand+http%3A%2F%2Fpositiveonrealestate.com%2F%3Fp%3D256" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.positiveonrealestate.com/pr/256/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

